Chad Frischmann: 0:03

We have to stop emissions. We have to accelerate and improve and maximise the potential of our natural ecosystems. And we create that when we create that balance of stopping emissions and stopping the sources of global warming and enhancing our natural systems to, to do what they do best, which is have a natural carbon cycle, we can actually stop and reverse global warming. That that's the point. That's the premise here.

Tom Raftery: 0:29

Good morning, good afternoon, or good evening, wherever you are in the world. Welcome to episode 247 of the Climate Confident Podcast, the go-to show for leaders who want to cut emissions and build what comes next. I'm your host, Tom Raftery, and before we get started, a quick reminder. For five euros or dollars a month, you can unlock the full back catalog of hundreds of in-depth conversations with the leaders shaping the climate transition. Subscribers also get a shout out here on the show and direct access to me for guest pitches, new directions, et cetera. Everyone else still gets the most recent 30 days for free, but if you want the full archive and a seat at the table, hit the subscribe link in the show notes. Now for today's conversation, and it's a big one, we talk constantly about emissions, cuts, targets, pathways 1.5 degrees C, but we rarely talk about the other half of the equation, restoring the natural systems that actually keep the planet stable. My guest this week has spent his career trying to bring that missing half back into the center of the climate discussion. Chad Frischmann is the co-creator of Project Drawdown and a leading voice in regenerative systems thinking. His message is blunt. Stopping global warming requires eliminating emissions and maximizing the power of ecosystems. And neither works without the other. This episode goes beyond technologies and policy. It's about mindsets, systems, and the future we're actually trying to build. Chad, welcome to the podcast. Would you like to introduce yourself?

Chad Frischmann: 2:16

Hi Tom. Thanks so much for having me on today. My name is Chad Frischmann. I work at the intersection of climate sustainability and regenerative systems transformation. I was the co-creator of an organisation called Project Drawdown. Which mapped, measured, and modeled all the technologies and practices that exist in the world today that can stop and begin to reverse global warming. And since then, I've started a couple new organisations, Regenerative Intelligence, which is an education and advisory company and the Global Solutions Alliance, which is a nonprofit creating a new knowledge system for regenerative future.

Tom Raftery: 2:47

Okay. Very good. And why, as in,

Chad Frischmann: 2:53

Why? What, which, which part? Which, which is the why in that question.

Tom Raftery: 3:00

what made you wake up one morning and decide, I gotta work in this space, I gotta do Project Drawdown, I gotta do Regen Intel. I got, you know what, what's the, the thinking, what's the motivation? Why?

Chad Frischmann: 3:12

Yeah. Well, you know, Tom, a lot of people who encounter my work over the last 15 years, the first thing they see or they think about is Project Drawdown of course, this has become, you know, one of the world's leading resources on climate solutions and behind Drawdown is a systematic scientific study ,looking at tens of thousands of data points. And I was the head of research there. And so everybody assumes, you know, Chad, you've got to be a data scientist or an atmospheric physicist, you know, like a standard climate scientist. And the reality is that I'm not actually, I'm actually an historian, an historian of political economy as it happens. Obviously right. The connection's right there. But a historian of political economy, language art, and storytelling. In short, I was a historian of propaganda. Now, I was doing my PhD work and my, my master's work at, the University of Oxford. Looking at systems change and the use of art, language, and stories in how institutions form and change and systems kind of develop over time. That's not a traditional path you might think that brings you to, you know, climate science and data assessments of, of all these different solutions and technologies. But I went on sabbatical when I was four years into my, PhD at Oxford and I went on a sabbatical. I was invited to a, royal wedding in Zambia, one of the larger tribes in Zambia. Right. And I said to myself, well, who could say no to a royal wedding in Zambia? Right?

Tom Raftery: 4:43

I've never said no to a royal wedding in Zambia.

Chad Frischmann: 4:46

I know, I mean, who could say no? So I was like, you know, I'm gonna do this right? And I took two months to backpack, not only in Zambia, but also Tanzania, Mozambique, and Malawi. Now, during that two months of backpacking I met a lot of amazing people along the way. A lot of local people, a lot of indigenous people, local communities. I'm a fairly sociable guy, and I just really fell in love with the joy. The comradery, the, the community connection that these people had, that's was so different than northern European or the United States where I was come, come from. But I also fell in love with the environment. I fell in love with the biodiversity, the, the landscape that is very rare these days in Sub-Saharan Africa. There are places in India, places all over the world, but they're they're shrinking. And that was the point because I also saw the degradation and destruction of that environment and of the communities that I was really falling in love with. And so these just, this destruction degradation was coming from the very systems I was studying the formation of from an historical context. So anyway, I flew back to Oxford. Five days after landing I put my PhD on suspension. I quit my full-time job and I flew to Berkeley, California. And at that moment, I decided to dedicate my life and my career to looking at that intersection between indigenous people's rights and wellbeing, environmental conservation, and sustainable development. Well, Tom, as you know, as you probably guess, and maybe a lot of your listeners might know this these are the frontline issues in a changing climate. Our biodiversity, our non-human species and environments. The indigenous peoples and local communities, and the world's populations experiencing the most poverty and inequities in the world. They are already experiencing climate change. They're experiencing it today, and they're gonna experience it far worse in the years to come than we can even imagine. So very quickly working in that space, I started to work on climate mitigation adaptation strategies, weaving conservation, and indigenous rights and wellbeing. And how do we improve people's livelihoods into how we approach climate? And that actually is what drew me to create Project Drawdown with Paul Hawkin and Amanda Ravenhill, to map, measure, model all the solutions that can stop and reverse global warming.

Tom Raftery: 7:15

Fascinating. Fascinating. And so looking at the current climate conversations, where do you see them falling short?

Chad Frischmann: 7:25

Current climate conversations are falling short, particularly in, let's just be straightforward in the last nine months. These climate, climate conversations are falling short because it's become almost a dirty word. We fought very long for decades. We've been fighting to, have climate change as part of the discourse. And actually let's, take a step back here because of course we have to understand that climate change is a response of earth systems, to something that we are actually doing, which is global warming, which we're increasing greenhouse gas emissions through all sorts of reasons, and that causes global warming. And so climate change is a response to that. Right. So, the climate discourse is kind of forgetting this really fundamental fact, which is we have to stop emissions. We have to accelerate and improve and maximise the potential of our natural ecosystems. And we create that when we create that balance of stopping emissions and stopping the sources of global warming and enhancing our natural systems to, to do what they do best, which is have a natural carbon cycle, we can actually stop and reverse global warming. That that's the point. That's the premise here. So we're kind of missing, I think the point here in the climate discourse is what do we actually need to do? What are the actions, the ways we can be implementing those actions that can have a tangible result in the physical world and then have all of these other cascading benefits to human wellbeing and our non-human wellbeing, human and non-human wellbeing, right? So, so I think that's kind of been missing in the dialogue a lot. And then of course, as I said. We've fought long to even get that concept into the vernacular of, of everyday discourse and society across the finance sector, business sector, policy sector, community sectors, all across the board. And now with with the new political economic systems that are taking shape in parts of the world, particularly in the United States with the, with the Trump administration and others apart across the world. What we're seeing is that all of that hard work is coming into question as the very words and the language that we've been using are coming into question as I said, and becoming almost a dirty word. I'm saying it left and right. Across all those areas, all those sectors that have made such headway, they're starting to pull back and I think that's a real danger.

Tom Raftery: 9:39

How do we reverse that?

Chad Frischmann: 9:42

Well, I think there's a couple things. First of all, been getting the language right, like going back to the really, the point is what are the actions? What are the things that we could do? What are the technologies, the practices, the behavior changes that we need that can solve not only for climate? That's important point is like when I designed the Drawdown Solutions framework and looking at all these different technologies. The point of them is that you can't do any one of them independently. You have to do them all as part of a system, a system of solutions. And the catch here, and this is the work I do now with Regenerative Intelligence and the Global Solutions Alliance is, that system of solutions can not only solve for the climate crisis that we're in, the reducing, mitigating and eventually reversing global warming. It does that, but it also helps protect and preserve biodiversity. It improves human health and wellbeing. it improves livelihoods across the board, across the board. It provides a more just, equitable, and resilient economy and society for today. And in the short, medium, and long term. These are just win-win, win, win, win win solutions. Right. And I think that's the point is how do we change this? How do we change this as you described? I mean, talk about other things. I mean, what we try to teach at RegenIntel is it's like a prism. It's like a, when you look at its prism, each part of the lens through which you look at these, the same sets of solutions, again, the different technology practice and behavior changes and mindset shifts can have tangible results on whatever issue area matters to you. So if we're talking about disaster preparedness and disaster relief, disaster recovery, same sets of solutions that can actually, if we do that right, can also reduce emissions. If we're talking about how do we preserve, protect our precious biodiversity and non-human species, those are the same sets of solutions. If we talk about avoiding refugee crisis or improved child wellbeing, health and well, health and wellbeing, same sets of solutions. If we're talking about if, if rights of human rights are part, are the, the lens with which we need to look, those are the solutions. But you know what if we wanna talk about just pure ROI, long-term RO, I return on investment. Right, we did the math here. That system of solutions that solve through all these cascading problems, all these cascading challenges, that system of solutions has a hundred approximately 190 to $120 trillion return on that investment over a 30 year period. Like, I mean, I call it the duh factor, like duh, like anybody who's looking at that, whatever lens you wanna do, if you wanna look at it from a financial lens. These are the right sets of solutions. And that's even if you not considering the risk component, right? The, the short, medium, and long-term risk to your business, risk, to your financial portfolio risk, to your constituencies and your communities of which you are reliant upon as a policymaker. If you don't even include those risks and you just look at the basic economics, it's a no-brainer. Adding those risk factors and it's like, well, why aren't we doing it?

Tom Raftery: 12:49

Why aren't we doing it?

Chad Frischmann: 12:51

Entrenched interests, right? We have to be reasonable. We have a very small group of extremely wealthy individuals at the helms of a very small collection of very powerful, wealthy corporations. That want to continue business as usual because they're making extreme profit and they understand that. And they have a mindset that looks in short-term gains. What's gonna happen in the next quarter? What's gonna happen in year two? They're not thinking about three, even three to four years into the future. They're not thinking about 10 years in the future. They're certainly not thinking about these small group of extremely wealthy, powerful individuals and corporations. They're not thinking about. Where is my company in 30 years from now? What is my company? What does that business look like 50 years from now? What's it doing? Is it thriving? If it's a family owned business, for example, Tom, what is my, what are my children and grandchildren leading in 50 years from now? Where's the legacy I'm leaving. They're not thinking about that. And a small group of them are, are not doing this. So I think, I think that's where we're seeing the biggest barriers to implementing these solutions that could really be transformative to the economy and to our society and to our environments.

Tom Raftery: 14:11

Right, and I mean, you talk about how emissions reduction isn't the only thing we need to do, and here on this podcast, I say that the podcast is about highlighting successful emissions reduction stories and strategies. So I'm missing a trick, right?

Chad Frischmann: 14:34

Oh, no, I think the, the, the, so, so. Mitigating emissions, which means I actually, not even like the word mitigate, I think it's like, it means to lessen, and I think we just need to eliminate emissions and we, we, you know, there's always gonna be maybe some, and that's, that's just the reality of life. In fact, when you breathe, you breathe, you are, you know, you're brain really in oxygen and you're, you're, you're exhaling carbon dioxide. I mean, there's a natural things that are gonna happen, of course, but we can, we can get that to, you know, within, within our industries, within our sectors, we can get that down to almost zero. And when you balance that out with ecological restoration, protection, and restoration of our land and our marine and, and, and water systems our natural ecosystems have a process called photosynthesis. Magic and a miracle of photosynthesis converting carbon dioxide and in some cases methane to soil organic carbon to biomass to store that safely. And we have that technology because it's been around for hundreds of millions of years, that, that, that, that is, that's basic. So we need to reduce those emissions, sure. But we also need to maximise the potential of our ecosystems. Now part of the challenge Tom, is when you degrade ecosystems, when you destroy and degrade our marine and terrestrial environments you're releasing carbon from the atmosphere. All that stored carbon gets released in the atmosphere. So the challenge that we're facing right now is that we're still emitting a lot of greenhouse gases across the board, and we are degrading our environment at record pace. So we're reducing the capacity of our natural systems to actually mitigate that problem. Now, beyond just the mitigation sequestration lens, these solutions have what we call at, RegenIntel cascading benefits. Not just co-benefits, like, so we also did a mapping. We looked at all the solutions for draw down solutions that can stop global warming. And we mapped them to achieve all the sustainable development goals. So my team and I did a research, we did analysis and basically through indirect or direct or indirect means nearly every technology and every practice has co-benefits that allow us to achieve all of the SDGs. Like, wow. Right. So these are co-benefits. This is, when you think about solar energy, right? If you think about solar energy solely solar photovoltaics solely as a technology about reducing emissions. You're missing a huge part of the picture. This is creating a resilient, distributed energy system that allows us to deal with shocks in our system, right? By having a di diversified and renewable source of, of energy. It allows for extension or electrification in areas that they currently don't have access to it. So it improves livelihoods. Is also a much healthier option, right? We, we, we all know about coal, oil and gas producing noxious fumes that are a detriment to our human health. And if we start thinking about the 800 million people on the planet that don't have access to electricity today and are using kerosene lamps for cooking and for lighting, and just imagine replacing that with solar. You're improving health outcomes for millions and mil, hundreds of millions of people. And at the same time, you know what you also do, Tom, you improve educational outcomes because students who are, studying with kerosene lambs and having health problems, which is seen all over the world, suddenly don't have those health problems. And you know what? They, do better in school. And they attain, you have better lives overall. So this is what we mean by all of these co-benefits. And then when you start mapping them Tom, to systems, thinking about systems of solutions and how the benefits of the system. You see what we call cascading benefits. These are feedback loop, virtuous feedback loops that create greater abundance across social, financial, ecological capital, the many different forms of capital they start to expand. When you start looking at these solutions as part of systems with cascading benefits that enhance and reinforce each other and, and create more abundance without extracting and exploiting. So, so that's what I, what I really wanna hone in on for your listeners, thinking about climate as an opportunity, right? Thinking about how we solve the climate crisis by, stopping global and reversing global warming, but then see that as an opportunity to design a better future for all, a better future for all our fellow humans and all our non-human kin.

Tom Raftery: 19:19

And just picking up a tiny little point there from that as well. I mean, the addition of solar to families who are using kerosene also reduces their spend on kerosene de facto, which gives them more disposable income for other things. So it increases the economic benefits to them and their community as well, right?

Chad Frischmann: 19:43

Precisely. Absolutely. Absolutely. You know, you know, Tom, you know, I wanna ask you, like, if you think about solar, do you think solar is the one and only answer to, to a renewable energy future?

Tom Raftery: 19:54

Of course not.

Chad Frischmann: 19:56

What other things have we got?

Tom Raftery: 19:58

I mean, there's wind as well, obviously. There's batteries. So those three together are a huge, huge lever not just in the developed world, but also in the developing world because it gives access to microgrids, for example, for communities and allows them massive economic development, which wouldn't have been possible in the absence of energy before.

Chad Frischmann: 20:25

Got it right on point. Right. It precisely that, Tom, I mean,'cause a lot of folks will say Solar, solar, solar, solar. And then you get the, the critics say, oh, well we can't just have it all be solar, because the sun. Sun doesn't shine all the time. And you get these silly things. We just, just recently there is a debate amongst gubernatorial debate in New Jersey where the two New Jersey candidates, democrat, republican Republicans, said, you know, we can't do wi we, we can't just focus on solar because sun doesn't shine all the time. Well, look, that's why no one's saying that we gotta, we gotta focus on a diversified portfolio of energy sources. Wind, solar, geothermal. Perennial biomass. So how do we grow the right kind of biomass and process that biomass creating economies of renewable economies of life? That's why I like to call it renewable economies of life. So how do we do that in a diversified portfolio that creates such resilience, right? That that in and of itself has, whether the sun isn't shining, the wind is blowing. If neither are there, you've got geothermal. If you don't have that at that time or place, you've got biomass. And these are all micro economies that reinforce each other, that create resilience, independence, and, and thriving livelihoods. I mean, these are the cascading benefits we talk about.

Tom Raftery: 22:51

yeah, yeah, yeah. tidal is another one, but the other one as well that people don't mention enough, I think, is the grid. Because it's not true to say the sun doesn't always shine or the wind doesn't always blow, because yes, the sun does always shine.'cause if the sun stopped shining tomorrow, we'd all be dead. So yes, the sun is always shining. Maybe not where you are at that moment in time, but you do interconnections to places where the sun is shining, and that way you get solar energy from your next door neighbor. You know, if you've cloud over your solar farm, your next door neighbor might not have, and so on and so on, and you grow that out and you make massive super grids. I mean, in China they have huge gigawatt scale solar farms in the desert, and they transport that energy to the coastal cities four and a half thousand kilometers over HVDC, UHVDC lines, ultra high voltage DC lines with minimal losses. And you look at that and you say, why isn't everybody doing that for God's sake?

Chad Frischmann: 24:03

There's so, you know, tell I feeling like there are so many duh actors, you know, reference that. Like there's like, I used to go on stages all the time and I used to do this thing where I'd be like, you know, so where these are win, win, win, win. It's like we've gotta get, people start to have these mindset shifts when they go uhhuh, uhhuh. And by the, by the fifth or sixth. Aha. Oh yeah. It becomes, duh, like, we should be doing this. We need a lot more of that in our education and in our communication about what these are. It's not just do this and you will reduce emissions. It's getting all of those aha factors. Until you get the switch that happens and it makes a a duh. Like, why aren't we looking at smart grids? Why aren't we looking at, right now my mind is slipping about the exact percentage, but we lose 30, 40% of all energy just in distribution before it even, before it even gets to when we turn on our lights. Just imagine that loss. The thing is we know we can be more efficient with it. We have better technology. One of the benefits of of AI, one really good benefit of AI is that it allows us to have smarter grids that can move things around. So the combination of technology that reduces that distribution losses with a smart grid technology that allows us create those super grids. I mean, this is the future. This is, this is, this is exactly, this has been written about in science fiction novels for decades. And yet some few people are making a lot of money in infrastructure that they've invested in over a long period of time. And they won't get out of it 'cause you're just gonna make as much money as they can before, before they have to. And there, that's what I wanna maybe, maybe wanna also talk a little bit about is there's gonna be a time. Tom when we just can't continue to do it.

Tom Raftery: 25:52

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Before we get there,

Chad Frischmann: 25:54

Yeah.

Tom Raftery: 25:56

you were talking a while ago about solutions, plural, but we really only mentioned the solar as being one of the solutions. What are some of the others?

Chad Frischmann: 26:05

Oh my goodness. Well, I mean, there's, there's, there's tons of solutions. I mean, my, my team and I mapped, measured, modeled about a hundred or 90 plus solutions across every area of human activity. So, I mean, we can talk about anything you'd like. One of the most important sectors that I think often gets missed out is that natural or, or our ecosystem based solutions. And that is inclusive of not only how we manage our land and marine systems, but also our, our food. You know, how we produce food what we're producing, and then ultimately how we look at the supply chain getting it from production all the way to our mouths. And then at the end of the day, when, because so much gets wasted throughout that system, how it gets disposed of. So I always like to talk about the food system because it's also really, Tom it's like a microcosm or it's like a nice lens that looks at every part of the system. You could, you could do a systemic look at every, every sector and the food system's so interesting because it touches upon every sector. As does almost every other sector. And that's one of the beautiful things that we, teach through regenerative intelligent our education programs is how to see how each sector is actually an interconnected system of systems and they all intersect with each other. But let's take, let's take food as an example.

Tom Raftery: 27:21

Well, food's a great example we all have to eat. So it's something massively relatable?

Chad Frischmann: 27:29

yeah. Absolutely. Like hopefully three times a day people get to eat. Right. You know, it's, and we all do it. And you know what? When you eat Tom, what do you experience when you eat?

Tom Raftery: 27:44

Well good question. Mostly joy, because I tend to eat with company. So for me, eating isn't just functional, it's also social.

Chad Frischmann: 27:59

Tom, it's like we're in some kind of mind meld right now. Joy. Joy is one of my favorite words. It really is. And it's, it's one of our core values.'cause I think when we really break it down, humanity down we exist for two reasons. Well, well, what we, we, we experience existence in two reasons, two ways. To, to survive, and to find joy. These are the two things. How do we survive in the world that we live in? And then how do we find some joy in that? And that joy factor is getting used and abused by our exploitative, extractive, capitalist, corporate capitalists system that markets and advertises the extreme excessive joy. But at the core, it's how we experience joy. So when you say like, food experience is joy, that is it. We experience joy when we consume food and I couldn't have, like, we could've couldn't have planted that word better from, from you. Thank you. Because it's so important.'cause that's why it's so relatable. But then we start to look at the system and we think about like you, like you, you, I dunno, I dunno about you Tom, but me. I love taking a piece of bread, and dipping it in some olive oil. Hmm. I mean, so good, right? It's like there's some, or like that butter. Ooh, I just love it. I love it. Now if we think about that crust of bread, we think about drop of oil that we're consuming, taking so much joy in, and we trace that back. We trace that to the olive trees and the orchards that are producing the olives and the, the wheat. And that's, that gets converted into, that gets, processed into flour and so on. We take that from the beginning. How we produce those crops matters. And we could do that with regenerative agriculture, multistory agroforestry. We can produce that butter if we want, with a silvopasture, which these are all just three solutions just to, you know and there's a host of other agricultural solutions that are regenerative. And, but it matters how you do it, how you implement those, how you do it right to create greater productive, more productive soil, reduced pesticides and fertilizer used, et cetera, et. Right there is a whole host of solutions in how we're producing that material, that input that goes into that bread and that olive oil, well, then we have to process it. We have to harvest it and we have to process it. So again, we go through a processing stage that converts that to flour and ultimately bakes the bread and, processes the olives and makes the olive oil. But then what do we do next? We have factories all over the world that are churning out emissions to produce cardboard, tin, glass, plastics to put that food in. And then what we do, we put that onto trucks trains boats, and sadly planes to fly luxury commodities all over the world in refrigerated containers using hydrofluorocarbons. Which is hundreds to thousands times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. And we ship them all over the world, spewing out long dead fossilised phytoplankton to move this food all around the world.'cause remember, that's what it is, really fossilised, phytoplankton that we're, we're burning and exerting, putting in the atmosphere, and then we put 'em into grocery stores where they overstocked due to the advertising, marketing industries desire to create this sense of abundance for their consumers, so they get overstocked, but only the perfect food that looks really good because we can't do the imperfect stuff because somehow the advertising world tells us we don't want that. Then we, then we over consume because also a lot of those grocery stores oversell. So they give you big giant bags of things and whatever. So you overstock and we, consumers, we take three, we take 30% of what we purchase at the store, we waste. It's like taking, it's like driving home with three bags of groceries and then you go, you go home and you take one of those bags and you throw it in the bin. Paper, tin, plastic, all, you just throw it under the bin and say bye. And then we have trucks pick up that garbage and put it into a waste, into a landfill where it emits methane now. So that was just a little story of the food system, that regenerative agriculture, tons of solutions that we have there and how to manage our food production. Far better ways that reduce emissions, create better livelihoods, healthier soils, increase biodiversity help reduce the decimation of our, bees and pollinators around our tons. We have tons of solutions in how we process our food. We have solutions in how we package our food using different types of materials that are grown instead of produced through synthetic means. And that are, that are done in more responsible and even in fact regenerative ways, regeneratively producing biomaterials that could be used for packaging. There's so many examples that we, I mean, I could list a bunch of them, but then we keep going on down the line and how we change our refrigerated containers to move away from hydrofluorocarbons to more natural alternatives. There are solutions there. There are solutions in how we transport our food. Right. They're... you're getting my point. Right. And there's solutions, of course, to across the board from, from all the way to the point where consumers just buy less. They buy what they're gonna consume, and that's it. So I see these as like a host of amazing opportunities. If I'm an advertiser marketer, there are, there are ways I can actually, change the culture around food consumption. If I, if I'm managing the waste of a city or, or a municipality, I can figure out alternative ways to recycle, reuse, to compost, to, even as a last resort, landfill, methane capture or, or waste to energy as a very, very, very last resort. If I am in packaging, tons of solutions. So across the board there are so many, and each one of those are opportunities for a business, opportunities for innovation, opportunities for investment, and there are opportunities to create a future we actually bloody want.

Tom Raftery: 34:25

Mm-hmm.

Chad Frischmann: 34:26

That's it.

Tom Raftery: 34:27

Yeah. Yeah. And you talk about regenerative agriculture, but you also talk about regenerative, lots of other things as well that, I've had lots of episodes on this podcast talking about regenerative agriculture, but not about other regenerative things. So talk to me about the expanded definition of regenerative.

Chad Frischmann: 34:50

Well, you know, that's a great, great question, Tom.'cause you know, regenerative is a regenerative systems as we, we like to call it regenerative economies. Regenerative systems. Regenerative is a, is a, a lens, it's a, at the core of it is how do we create systems that have place life at the center of our decision making. So how do we emulate our natural systems in which we are actually part of? Right? So we are ourselves a regenerative system. Your body is a regenerative system. The environments and the ecologies that we live in are regenerative systems. This is their natural world. But how do we take our human systems and mirror that so that at the core end goal, we're creating a system that regenerates life. That continues to create these, the, you know, ensuring that life, the conditions for life to thrive in its fullest capacity are in place. So regenerative agriculture's an important thing because at the core of what regenerative agricultural means, how to produce food in ways that ensure life thrives in abundance. That that's what its core regenerative agriculture is all about. Now, regenerative energy systems. How do we create and design diversified energy portfolios that place life at the center of that, right? How do we ensure that we reduce the exploitation and extraction, the degradation of our natural systems and our remember our bodies, so our human, like our actual like exploitation of people, but get that to end that exploitation and create a regenerative system where that our bodies, our lives are thriving, our environments are thriving, other species are thriving. So designing those renewable energy systems that we just talked about earlier, it becomes a regenerative system when we are creating energy systems that don't decimate our pollinators, that don't destroy the health and livelihood of our outcomes of our most marginalised populations in both low income countries or, what we might wanna call it, the global majority of places.'cause you gotta remember the global majority, but even in the global minority. Even in places like the United States and, and in, you know, in part there neighborhoods in Los Angeles that themselves are experiencing a degradation of, of human health outcomes from energy systems just around the corner. So when I talk about regenerative energy systems, I'm talking about energy systems that allow life to thrive and you know, regenerative built environment. So how do we create buildings that are living, that are contributing to the wellbeing and the welfare of our human bodies and our non-humans kin. Transportation systems even our human education and health systems and health somehow feels like logical, right?'cause regenerative healthcare, that's actually a thing that often is associated with longevity thing. But I work with a lot of health professionals, doctors former health policy makers who aren't focused on the longevity side, but regenerative health for them means how do we create institutions and so, and systems within healthcare that ensure that we are, preventing disease as opposed to treating disease. And that prevention of disease is seen as regenerative.'cause we're actually, we're actually regenerating, not necessarily a, a limb or something like this, but we're regenerating our wellbeing. Right. We're, we're, we're, we're allowing that to to have systems regenerating the system itself, the institutions themselves. So when I think about regeneration or regenerative systems, I think far beyond just planting trees, which is important, particularly making sure you do the right species. In the right place on the right time. Really, really important. But also, you know, in, in agriculture and regenerative ocean systems, these are all sort of our natural systems that make a lot of sense. But we need to look across the board all areas of human activity and place that regenerative lens on them, and let's maximise the cascading benefits that creates these virtuous regenerative cycles of abundance, wellbeing, and justice.

Tom Raftery: 39:00

And are you seeing any signs of this shift already from policy makers, or markets, or anything at all?

Chad Frischmann: 39:10

first of all, Tom regenerative as a concept, regeneration as a concept has a very long legacy. We're talking about Buckminster Fuller, you know, Bucky, Bucky Fuller we're talking about Danella Meadows. We're talking about Carol Sandford, a whole host of thinkers and doers spending decades who've been talking about regenerative systems, either using that term or around or adjacent vernacular that have evolved over time. So this is, this isn't something new, right? I mean, Janine, Benny is biomimicry. There's so many John Fullerton regenerative economics. There's, this is a long lineage of folks who've been working in this space and, you know, we're part of it. So what I wanna say there is this concept of life-affirming systems has, influence in many of, you know, in sustainability. For example, if you unpack Danella Meadows systems approach to an understanding of sustainability, it is essentially a regenerative system that she's talking about, right? So it really has had a lot of influence across the board in a lot of the movements that take have taken shape. Now that being said how much of our system is actually regenerative in the way we're defining it? Well, how much of it's actually sustainable? How much of it's actually climate solutions? We're talking about a tiny fraction. Very, very small percentage of the system is actually operating in that way. And that's because of the wealth, power, and prestige of the people and organisations that are existing in that extractive, exploitative system now. But what I am seeing here is a system in its death throws, right? I'm seeing a world in which, our earth systems are slapping our human systems right in the face. And it's already been happening. It's gonna get much worse. I call these the great catastrophes. And I'm not a dooomer. I'm not a gloomer, right? I'm the optimist guy. I'm the solutions guy. I, I really think that we've got it and we can do it, but I'm not disillusioned. I, I am not an ostrich putting my head in the sand. I wanna be grounded in reality and then build towards that future now. We have already emitted so much. We've already destroyed so much of our natural ecosystems. We've already disrupted our hydrological cycles to such an extent that even if we switched everything overnight, we'd still have built in tipping points built in catastrophes already in the system, which is why I often say, Tom, the idea of incorporating climate risk is ridiculous. There's no such thing as climate risk. There's just climate reality, We should not be feeling the risk of these significant catastrophes in, various natural and human sectors and systems. It's already built in. We need to lessen that. And eventually get through it and thrive. I call it thriving through the catastrophes. How do we thrive through this? And I think we can do that. And that means building up the capacity of these regenerative systems, regenerative companies, regenerative portfolios, financial portfolios, regenerative communities, regenerative systems, the models all over the world. If we can get to 20, 30%, I think we have the capacity to thrive through the builtin catastrophes that are, are looming. Again, I don't wanna scare people'cause I, I'm not a doomer. I'm not talking about the end of civilization and humans are off gonna be extinct from the planet. I mean, Bill Gates recently said much, to my regret, he discounted climate and said, focus on human health and wellbeing. And I, I, I think it's ridiculous that he said that, but one thing he got right is that climate change isn't going to wipe out humanity. But it's going to cause an unprecedented level of destruction, death, impoverishment that sense of joy that you experienced, that we talked about earlier, was gonna be diminished for billions of people so greatly if we don't make these changes. So I, I guess my point in saying here is, is a long-winded way of saying we're not there yet. We have the potential because there's regenerative companies and initiatives and systems popping up all over the world. We need to accelerate that. We need to invest in that and see ourselves as a society, a system of societies, 'cause there's many different societies. But see all these societies operating in 50 years from now and thriving, imagine that. And then we build towards it. And I think that's really the key here, is we gotta, we gotta have architects and designers and business leaders who want to see their company, their investment portfolio, their community thriving 50 years from now, based on the reality of what, What's right in front of us, which is earth systems, slapping the human systems right in the face.

Tom Raftery: 44:04

Okay. For people who are listening who want to act on regeneration, where should they begin?

Chad Frischmann: 44:11

I'm gonna do a little bit of a self plug there because I think it's what I dedicate my life to. So Regenerative Intelligence is an education company. And we think, think ourselves as an education company, not only to educate and train and upskill individuals to be current and future leaders of that next economy that we've just talked about. Like how do we do that today? But we also advise companies, funds and communities on how to plan and strategise for that future, how to become that company 30 years from now, that's thriving and the leader of the economy, not a laggard who's struggling, right? So how do we do that? So Regen Intel offers that, and we see this as education, right? We see this as training. We see the skill building. So go to www.regenintel.earth and learn about our education platform, which has been described as the only master's course on regeneration in the world today. We have trained over 180 fellows and leaders from around the world all of them launching amazing projects in the world that are regenerative projects. So the more we come through that program, the more projects that we can unleash into the world and get to the point where we can thrive through what's in front of us.

Tom Raftery: 45:21

Lovely, lovely left field question. If you could have any person or character, alive or dead, real or fictional as a champion for a regenerative future, who would it be and why?

Chad Frischmann: 45:40

Wow, Tom, that's a question I've never been asked or thought of. If a real or fiction who could be a champion of a regenerative future and why? Well, I got it. So in my mind it's very clear we need to have Gandalf,

Tom Raftery: 46:03

Brilliant.

Chad Frischmann: 46:04

We need to have Gandalf. Gandalf because Gandalf, you know, he, he represents in Tolkien's world of the Lord of the Rings. For those who don't know that, Gandalf represents a an entity, a being that helps guide and steward the end and destruction of an extractive exploitative system to enhance and strengthen one that is better for all life. And he has one really important principle. I actually adopt this. What's really funny, you bring this up 'cause I, now I think about it. I just wrote a peace on this because it's something I call the Suaron principle. Now, for those, again, who don't know Lord of the Rings, Sauron is the antagonist in, in, in the Lord of the Rings story. He's the, architect of all that is evil and exploitative, and extractive in the world. But he creates these rings of power and, and there's one ring to rule them all. And the whole point of the entire set of novels is that this one, Sauron is trying to get this one ring to rule over all of the world. And I think Gandalf, what Gandalf does is he leads this fellowship of the ring to destroy the that one ring so that we could not have one ring to rule them all. Now, I actually use this analogy, Tom, all the time when I talk about regenerative systems. All the time. I just wrote a piece on it and where I say, you know, the Anti-Sauron Principle. We need to build our systems to be interoperable, collaborative, working collectively and in, in, in constructive overlap instead of competition. And instead of trying to get to be the one platform, the one approach, the one model, the one framework to rule them all. So the Anti-Sauron principle is really fundamental to a regenerative future and regenerative economies. And that's why I would have Gandalf be our champion for, for a better future for all.

Tom Raftery: 48:03

Fantastic. Chad, that's been great. If people would like to know more about yourself or any of the topics we discussed on the podcast today, where would you have me direct them?

Chad Frischmann: 48:14

Well, I'd say as the first go-to is again, www regen Intel dot Earth. That is really the core of my work these days. We also have a nonprofit called the Global Solutions Alliance. Www dot GSA Earth. I also have my own podcast called Chad's Climate Quest, which Tom, I'd like to invite you on for one of my episodes.

Tom Raftery: 48:35

Great. Brilliant. Love it. Look forward to it. Chad that's been fascinating. Thanks a million for coming on the podcast today.

Chad Frischmann: 48:42

Thank you so much, Tom. It's been a pleasure. See you soon.

Tom Raftery: 48:45

Okay, we've come to the end of the show. Thanks everyone for listening. If you'd like to know more about the Climate Confident podcast, feel free to drop me an email to tomraftery at outlook. com or message me on LinkedIn or Twitter. If you like the show, please don't forget to click follow on it in your podcast application of choice to get new episodes as soon as they're published. Also, please don't forget to rate and review the podcast. It really does help new people to find the show. Thanks. Catch you all next time.